Powered By Blogger

Tuesday, May 31, 2011

Interesting read.


(Photo: Robert Maxwell. Hair by Campbell McAuley/Solo Artists. Makeup by Shannon Hughey.)

During the recent and overly publicized breakdown of ­Charlie Sheen, I was repeatedly contacted by the media and asked to comment, as it was assumed that I know a thing or two about starring on a sitcom, fighting with producers, nasty divorces, public meltdowns, and bombing through a live comedytour. I have, however, never smoked crack or taken too many drugs, unless you count alcohol as a drug (I don’t). But I do know what it’s like to be seized by bipolar thoughts that make one spout wise about Tiger Blood and brag about winning when one is actually losing.

It’s hard to tell whether one is winning or, in fact, losing once one starts to think of oneself as a commodity, or a product, or a character, or a voice for the downtrodden. It’s called losing perspective. Fame’s a bitch. It’s hard to handle and drives you nuts. Yes, it’s true that your sense of entitlement grows exponentially with every perk until it becomes too stupendous a weight to walk around under, but it’s a cutthroat business, show, and without the perks, plain ol’ fame and fortune just ain’t worth the trouble.

“Winning” in Hollywood means not just power, money, and complimentary smoked-salmon pizza, but also that everyone around you fails just as you are peaking. When you become No. 1, you might begin to believe, as Cher once said in an interview, that you are “one of God’s favorite children,” one of the few who made it through the gauntlet and survived. The idea that your ego is not ego at all but submission to the will of the Lord starts to dawn on you as you recognize that only by God’s grace did you make it through the raging attack of idea pirates and woman haters, to ascend to the top of Bigshit Showbiz Mountain.

All of that sounds very much like the diagnosis for bipolar disorder, which more and more stars are claiming to have these days. I have it, as well as several other mental illnesses, but then, I’ve always been a trendsetter, even though I’m seldom credited with those kinds of things. And I was not crazy before I created, wrote, and starred in television’s first feminist and working-class-family sitcom (also its last).

I so admire Dave Chappelle. You did right for yourself by walking away, Dave. I did not have the guts to do it, because I knew I would never get another chance to carry so large a message on behalf of the men and women I grew up with, and that mattered most to me.

After my 1985 appearance on The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson, I was wooed by producers in Hollywood, who told me they wanted to turn my act into a sitcom. When Marcy Carsey—who co-owned Carsey-Werner with her production partner, Tom Werner (producers of The Cosby Show)—asked me to sign, I was impressed. I considered The Cosby Show to be some of the greatest and most revolutionary TV ever.

Marcy presented herself as a sister in arms. I was a cutting-edge comic, and she said she got that I wanted to do a realistic show about a strong mother who was not a victim of Patriarchal Consumerist Bullshit—in other words, the persona I had carefully crafted over eight previous years in dive clubs and biker bars: a fierce working-class Domestic Goddess. It was 1987, and it seemed people were primed and ready to watch a sitcom that didn’t have anything like the rosy glow of middle-class confidence and comfort, and didn’t try to fake it. ABC seemed to agree. They picked up Roseanne in 1988.

It didn’t take long for me to get a taste of the staggering sexism and class bigotry that would make the first season of Roseanne god-awful. It was at the premiere party when I learned that my stories and ideas—and the ideas of my sister and my first husband, Bill—had been stolen. The pilot was screened, and I saw the opening credits for the first time, which included this: CREATED BY MATT WILLIAMS. I was devastated and felt so betrayed that I stood up and left the party. Not one person noticed.

I confronted Marcy under the bleachers on the sound stage when we were shooting the next episode. I asked her how I could continue working for a woman who had let a man take credit for my work—who wouldn’t even share credit with me—after talking to me about sisterhood and all that bullshit. She started crying and said, “I guess I’m going to have to tell Brandon [Stoddard, then president of ABC Entertainment] that I can’t deliver this show.” I said, “Cry all you want to, but you figure out a way to put my name on the show I created, or kiss my ass good-bye.”

I saw two things today, One made shake my head, the other made me smile.

today1.mp3 Listen on Posterous

Friday, May 27, 2011

‘Twilight’ to ‘True Blood’: Why we suck the evil out of vampires | Hero Complex – movies, comics, fanboy fare – latimes.com

GUEST ESSAY

"Twilight" (Summit Entertainment)/"True Blood" (HBO)/"Underworld" (Screen Gems, Inc.)/"Blade" (New Line Productions)

Vampires are everywhere in film, television, novels, comics and beyond and there’s no end in sight. But when did they shift from malevolent predators to conflicted antiheroes? Those are the questions asked by  Christopher Farnsworth, a writer living in Los Angeles whose latest novel, “The President’s Vampire,” is on sale now.

It used to be you’d never see a vampire as the good guy. After all, a vampire, by its nature, hunts and kills human beings. There are centuries of folklore detailing how mankind has been forced to defend itself against these lethal parasites. That’s not a reputation you lose overnight.

But today, vampires have moved into the light – metaphorically speaking, anyway. Edward Cullen and his family of vampire vegetarians – who only drink animal blood – are only the most famous examples. The ranks of on-screen vampire good guys includes Bill Compton from “True Blood,” Angel and Spike from “Buffy the Vampire Slayer,” Nick Knight from “Forever Knight,” the title hero from the “Blade” films and comics, Mick Angel from the “Moonlight” series, Selene from “Underworld” and maybe a dozen more that even I’ve never heard of.

"Dracula" cover (Dell Comics)

Like everything else, however, comics got there first. Comic books have been turning vampires into superheroes since at least 1966, when Dell Comics tried to turn three of the iconic Universal horror monsters into heroes. A direct descendant of Dracula put on a purple bodysuit and a bat-shaped belt-buckle and swore an oath to fight injustice. Was it a concept ahead of its time — or just a concept with bad timing? Either way, the series lasted all of three issues.

But the idea endured and evolved. The Marvel character Blade crossed from comics to film and back again. The Japanese anime “Hellsing and “Vampire Hunter D both feature bloodsuckers who’ve turned against their own kind. And the Confessor from Kurt Busiek’sAstro City is basically Batman with fangs.

Then there’s the bookshelf and all the novels about vampiric heroes: Fred Saberhagen’s Thorn series, Anne Rice’s Lestat, P.N. Elrod’s Vampire Files, Jon F. Merz’s Lawson Vampire books, and (ahem) my own creation, Nathaniel Cade, a vampire who works as a secret agent for the president of the United States.

Vampire heroes are so common now that I felt it necessary to reestablish Cade’s credentials as a killer. He might drink cow’s blood by choice but he’s a predator by nature.

For me, that goes back to a single page from Marvel’s classic ’70s horror comic, “The Tomb of Dracula.” The series was about a team of vampire hunters tracking the Lord of the Undead. But when we passed around the issues in grade school, my friends and I often found ourselves rooting for the bad guy.

"Tomb of Dracula" (Marvel Comics)

Part of this was because the creators put Dracula up against even worse villains, like, say, Satan. And Dracula had his own code of honor. Which led him to pick up a cross against a horde of zombie-like undead who threatened the children who’d given him shelter for a night. That scene is burned into my memory just like the cross burned his hands. I’m not the only one. Blogger Final Girl (a.k.a. Stacie Ponder) has a great piece on the issue. The final line of the book: “The dark ones attacked us … but there was a good man here. He told us to believe in the power of God … and that he was going to chase the dark ones … all the way to Hell itself!”

As much as I disliked vampires – I read the comics and watched the movies for survival tips rather than entertainment – I was impressed. For a moment, the face of ultimate evil finds redemption defending the innocents.

"The President's Vampire" (G.P. Putnam's Sons)

But that’s the dichotomy that drives all these stories in one way or another: the gulf between killer and hero. In my first book, Cade puts it like this: “Someone has to protect the meek until they can inherit the earth.”

Of course, Dracula went back to eating people soon enough. It’s possible too many sparkly vampires have inspired a similar backlash. Colin Farrell seems more like a serial killer in this summer’s remake of “Fright Night.” Vampires are ugly, big and scary in”Priest” and Justin Cronin’s  “The Passage.” And no less than Abe Lincoln will be chopping off vamp heads soon in a theater near you.

Then again, Edward and the “Twilight” film franchise will be back in “Breaking Dawn,” and Johnny Depp will play Barnabas Collins in “Dark Shadows,” and the BBC’s “Being Human” is a U.S. spinoff now. And, well, I’m going to write about Cade for as long as people will read about him. I’m not ready to seal the coffin on vampire heroes just yet. Vampires have haunted us in every culture because they’re so perfectly adaptable as metaphors. There are still plenty of scary things out there in the dark. Maybe it’s comforting to think one or two might be on our side for a change.

– Christopher Farnsworth

RECENT AND RELATED

Joss who? Meet the writer of the new ‘Buffy’ film

Ron Howard’s quest for ‘The Dark Tower’

‘Stake Land’ director talks vampires and Americana

‘Priest’: Not your mother’s vampire movie

ON THE SET: Photos from ‘Priest’ production

Too draining? Harris saying goodbye to Sookie

‘Phantasm,’ the 30-year reunion interview

Stephen King digs into “American Vampires”

Del Toro talks “The Strain” and “Frankenstein”

‘Let Me In’ star: ‘I scare myself when I watch the movie’

Thursday, May 26, 2011

DC Women Kicking Ass - Dwayne McDuffie on writing black characters

DC Women Kicking Ass - A chat with former Batgirl writer Barbara Randall Kesel: "I just wanted to read stories where the women didn't embarrass me"

DC Women Kicking Ass

Thoughts, pictures, reviews and other stuff about the women of DC Comics, and occasionally Marvel and other places, who kick ass. Comic Blog Elite

Site Meter

Site Meter

free web counter
Share

May 26 '11

A chat with former Batgirl writer Barbara Randall Kesel: “I just wanted to read stories where the women didn’t embarrass me”

Barbara Randall Kesel is one of the key writers in building the history and character of Barbara Gordon at DC Comics. While Kesel didn’t write many stories that included Barbara, the ones she did write are seminal. Among among them the post-Crisis origin story “Flawed Gems” which was named one of the most memorable moments for DC women earlier this year and the “Last Batgirl story” the only standalone Batgirl comic published prior to The Killing Joke. Kesel also wrote the Elseworlds: Batgirl/Supergirl special and she has the rare distinction of writing Barbara Gordon as both Batgirl and Oracle.

Earlier this week I interviewed Barbara about her work on how she got started writing at DC, her work on Barbara Gordon both pre and post The Killing Joke (including her follow-up pitch for Barbara Gordon that was passed over to have her become Oracle) and what it was like being a female creator during the 80s at DC and how things have changed since then.

DCWKA: I read that you got into comic writing after sending a letter to DC making suggestions about how they could write women better, do you remember what you said in the letter? Any stories that stood out as bothering you?

BRK: I should dig into my files someday to see if I can come up with the rough draft, but my letter was in response to a letter in the back of one of the Batman comics (maybe Detective?). The letter writer suggested that DC’s female characters were a little shallow, and maybe they should hire some female writers or artists. Dick Giordano’s editorial reply was that he didn’t think it made any difference, so I shot off a ten-page missive disagreeing, with examples. I had no idea he’d call and want to interview me for a job; I just wanted to read comics where the women didn’t embarrass me. When I was a kid, the lesson comics was teaching me was that boys got to keep their powers, but Wonder Woman and Supergirl had off-and-ons (and Supergirl had this OLD and UGLY boyfriend in the seventies! Eeyew!J) when she wasn’t hiding in an orphanage or a tree. I loved the idea of superheroes and being a hero, but not of standing around waiting for permission or instructions from the guy first.

Even saying that, though, it’s not just about having the women be good characters: it’s about ALL characters having personality and distinctive voices. I wasn’t just advising how to make the women better, but the men too. They can all be eye candy; they can all also be interesting on the inside. My point was that if the creators invested a little of themselves in their stories and maybe spent some time in the company of someone who was different, they’d make better comics. I still believe that. Comics, that unique blending of words and pictures that charges up both lobes of the brain, is a medium with incredible power to spark the imagination and touch the heart. I want to see that power used for good.

DCWKA: What was your take on how Barbara Gordon was handled by DC before you showed up?

BRK: I didn’t care for the character. I had only ever read one or two Batgirl stories before being asked to write one, so they sent me copies of all of them and I pretty much enjoyed them. [I was terribly disappointed to be asked to write Batgirl—I had some issues with that girl: my name is Barbara, my father’s name is James, and I had to walk the villain gauntlet in second grade because of the TV show: two boys (who knows who their real identities were) who said they were the Penguin and the Joker tried to “capture” me before class every morning… Hey, I was young and tiny. If I’d been a teenaged cosplayer, it might have been fun. But I was a very literal-minded terrified kid and learned to kick like a demon.] Batgirl had a spotty history with each writer adding their own skew to her mythos, which wasn’t bad, until you looked at them all together and tried to figure out how old she should be. Just like most comics stories, some are lame and some are great, and each reader’s list will be different. I ended up liking her a lot more after reading them all than I did when I started out, so I flipped the chip off my shoulder and compiled a character history that made all the pieces work.

DCWKA: You were hired for to write the Batgirl back-up but only wrote one. If you had written more, did you have any plans for the character?

BRK: I wrote two stories: the first was published in two parts in Detective [#518 and #519] before Dick was promoted and Len [Wein] decided to boot Batgirl for Catwoman. [Note: Catwoman replaced Batgirl as the back-up in Detective starting with issue #520] one (part one of two) was used as a training script for new artists, so I’ve seen MULTIPLE versions of it.

Dick had had me do up a rough outline for where the feature would go, but each story was going to be written as we got to it. Some of that outline material became backstory in the Secret Origins story and the Batgirl Special: Marcy would have been a foil character/best friend and I think there might have been another character inserted in there somewhere, but… sadly, my old project files are in storage or I could tell you for sure.

DCWKA: Tell me about how they approached you to write the Secret Origins and Batgirl Special. Did they give you any direction about how the character should be portrayed?

BRK: It was pretty much  this simple: “She’s getting her spine blown out in ‘The Killing Joke’, so try to make people care.” 

DCWKA: Did you know exactly what would happen to Barbara in the Killing Joke? What was your reaction when you found out? How did you find out?

BRK:I did: TKJ was in progress before I started on the Origin and the Special. I was torn—I really admire Alan’s work, but I hated seeing Batgirl stay down. I actually followed it up with a proposal for a new heroic identity for Batgirl (working with Dan Mishkin, I think?) that would have used the technology available in the DCU to let her walk and fight: basically, she’d have armor with Promethium joints and Star Labs tech that would let her use her photographic memory to program in her former movements: she’d still be paralyzed without the armor but able to patrol and fight (guardedly, part of the psychology of recovering from the attack that paralyzed her) while wearing it. That got accepted and then axed in favor of the Oracle storyline. Which is a damn good use of her character, but it’s still creepy that DC women seem to stay damaged and dead while the men… sigh.

DCWKA: How would you categorize DC Comics’ view of women during that time. What was it like being one of the few female writers?

BRK: I quickly went from freelancer to associate editor, so I wasn’t just writing for DC, but being a writer there was part of why Dick hired me. Jenette Kahn ran the company then. DC corporate didn’t have anything against women (in fact, I pretty much owe my job to Jenette’s telling Dick that he needed more women in editorial right around the time I showed up all opinionated and creative…), but the individual writers and artists didn’t so much choose to include women as admire and enjoy them…and forget to look at the stories from their POV. (The clearly obvious exception being Wolfman and Perez’s New Teen Titans.)

Every time I pointed out to a creator that they had a character (male or female, but most often female) standing around doing nothing and asked them to make a pass through their scripts from each character’s POV, they got better about that.

They weren’t looking to exclude women; they just didn’t think about it. It is a natural bias to connect with the character closest to you. At DC at that time, that was usually male writers and artists, so the male characters took prominence. Over the years, when fans who weren’t white males would say “Why don’t I see (me) in comics?” I’d say it was because THEY weren’t making them. The writer works out of his own ego first. The artist works out of his own mirror first, You can remember to work around that natural bias, but that’s where we all start. (Okay, way more artists than writers would include women, but largely as eye candy, and they might include random people on the street, but if you said “draw a hero” without any further instructions, you’d get a while male character.)

I love comics, but I am a girl. I might climb rocks and race bicycles, but I’m not a boy. But that doesn’t mean I can’t observe and replicate behavior, or that I don’t have a working imagination. But since I’m not a boy, there’s a background culture of boys doing stories for boys and assuming boys can do a better job at that, so there’s a lot of people who think I “can’t” write a mainstream superhero story. (I would just RATHER write one with a character just like me!) I did (and still do) beat my head against the wall when I pitch something for a male character, then get told I can’t write that, but what about (insert suggestion to work on second-rate female character here)? I’m trying to remember if there were any other women writers back at DC at that time, and I’m sure there must have been, but I’m only coming up with Barbara Slate of “Angel Love.” Weezie [Note: Louise Simonson] was working at Marvel, and Wendy Pini had made a success of Elfquest with Richard, Colleen [Doran] started up “A Distant Soil”, and Gail Simone wouldn’t start blogging for another decade…

DCWKA: I was struck by how much time Barbara spent on a computer in both of the final stories you wrote given the direction the character took post TKJ. Did it surprise you that Barbara showed in Suicide Squad as a computer jock? Did you ever speak to Kim Yale and John Ostrander about the character?

BRK: Oh, yes, we talked. Kim was passionate about Barbara not sitting on the sidelines. While my stories weren’t a direct setup, I think they helped inspire the idea of Oracle. I had worked in a library and knew that the profession of “librarian” was morphing into “information retrieval specialist” thanks to computers, and projected that she’d be way ahead of the curve thanks to her extraordinary recall. And it was a cooler take on the profession than the bun-wearing book handler. Kim took Barbara’s (the fictional one) situation very seriously and worked tirelessly to promote Barbara’s rehabilitation.

DCWKA:  I believe you are the only person who has written contemporary versions of Barbara Gordon as Batgirl and Oracle. What was it like to write her in Hawk and Dove? How did you approach that?

Hawk & Dove was co-written with my ex-husband, so I can’t take credit for all of the writing. I’d done a multi-page character assessment of her when I wrote the first backup stories, so I just kept on with the same character in new circumstances. Driven, and keeps her fears in a box in the back of her head.

DCWKA: The Barbara Gordon Batgirl/Supergirl Elsewords seems quite different from the Barbara Gordon as Batgirl but is more like Barbara as Oracle. What was your take on the character when writing her?

BRK: That she was Barbara with Batman’s origin: SHE was the one working her way through the vengeance motive with her own different set of skills and a single-minded focus on keeping everyone else safe. (The inside joke being that Bruce himself is a little listless—she seems to have something he lacks…yeah! His origin.)

DCWKA: The Elseworlds issue is very popular and the characters even had their own action figures. Has DC ever spoken to you about doing another one?

BRK: Sadly, it sold out when it first went on sale, which I think is a crime, since we’ll never know how many copies might have sold to people who came in during the rest of that month. And then they didn’t want to reprint it because…(or so I was told)…it didn’t sell enough. Holy self-fulfilling prophecy, Batman! We pitched one idea for a sequel. We were shot down and then told DC didn’t want another. I’m hoping they reprint the original someday.[Note: copies are listed on Amazon between $17 and $70]

DCWKA: Any thoughts on how Barbara Gordon has been written over the last few years?

BRK: I like her. I like the strength of will and character she’s been allowed. I especially like the Dick Grayson hookup, although part of my initial direction underlying my first stories, was that Barbara was fixated on Batman: that Batgirl is the unleashed sexual persona she doesn’t allow herself in her work world, making her the equal and ideal partner to the most exciting male influence in her life. It’s no biggie now, but back then (those days before fetish gear became the standard costuming) I made a point of saying that her costume was leather, not leotard. She was her own bad girl.

DCWKA: DC almost made Barbara Gordon return to being Batgirl during the “Battle for the Cowl” but decided to keep her as Oracle. Do you think she should return to being Batgirl?

BRK: A little too much water under the bridge for that, I think. I like Oracle: I think it’s great that a “disabled” character is that powerfully connected and effective. And I like their new Batgirl, so I’d keep it as is. (Well, as it is this week. Things change…)

DCWKA: How do you think DC handles female characters vs. 25 years ago? What’s better?

BRK: What’s worse? Hmmm… any answer would have to rate each individual title, and each character in that title. The company as a whole has a strong bias toward an older male readership, which is kind of limiting. Even so, I could pick up a half dozen and find scenes I’m proud of. What’s better is that the world as a whole is better represented—it’s not just white males. What’s worse is that the stories, while intense and exciting, don’t seem to be at all accessible to new readers. Given the success of superhero movies in recent years, you’d think at least part of the audience would be invited to sample the source material, but you see current-day sales figures, and… doesn’t look like it.

I was just discussing this with a prominent comics creator on Monday, how DC has such a wealth of iconic characters but seems determined to keep them inaccessible to the general public. The material is so intense, both on a violence and sexuality level, but also on a plain ol’ composition and storytelling level, that it’s a bullet train—hard to leap onto something that never slows down beyond blur. Of course, the next new generation of readers likely won’t want to touch an icky old paper comic anyway, so we just need to set up their iPad version to read panel-by-panel so they can access the flow at their own comprehension speed.

DCWKA: If you had a chance to write any DC character today who would it be? Any female character?

BRK: Hawkman, but the version I like is the old one, half of the husband-and-wife cop team from another planet, which supplies the other answer.

73 notes 9 Comments Tags: interview Barbara Gordon DC Comics

  1. legwarmersandmohawks reblogged this from dcwomenkickingass

  2. midori-fairy reblogged this from dcwomenkickingass

  3. midori-fairy liked this

  4. msdiscolady liked this

  5. legendarywomen liked this

  6. dirtyriver reblogged this from dcwomenkickingass and added:

    Secret Origins feature...usual ploy : make...give its...
  7. quarian liked this

  8. shobogan reblogged this from dcwomenkickingass

  9. primegundam liked this

  10. sadieblodgett liked this

  11. iamkanna reblogged this from ladiesmakingcomics

  12. chrysilla liked this

  13. booklover81 liked this

  14. fullofwhoa reblogged this from dcwomenkickingass and added:

    Fantastic interview! Click...comics, Batgirl/Oracle/Barbara Gordon,
  15. nikilighthouse reblogged this from dcwomenkickingass

  16. taliadinasdaysoffuturepast reblogged this from dcwomenkickingass

  17. taliadinasdaysoffuturepast liked this

  18. tygermama reblogged this from dcwomenkickingass

  19. buttertoast89 liked this

  20. jhenne-bean liked this

  21. razingcomplacency liked this

  22. gwenfrankenstien liked this

  23. ceebee-eebee liked this

  24. me2metoomewtwo reblogged this from ladiesmakingcomics

  25. stefi-leekx liked this

  26. ghostgreen liked this

  27. poetactics liked this

  28. triplej18 liked this

  29. foreverrhapsody liked this

  30. menshevixen liked this

  31. dullscythe liked this

  32. elephantcrossing liked this

  33. peppers-pray reblogged this from knifeyutensil and added:

    Awesome, awesome interview. The revelations are disturbing...a bit depressing, but...
  34. snappily liked this

  35. sparksthekayla liked this

  36. ladiesmakingcomics reblogged this from dcwomenkickingass

  37. peppers-pray liked this

  38. thegreatfapplr liked this

  39. hellishhurricane liked this

  40. pheonixxangel liked this

  41. pheonixxangel reblogged this from dcwomenkickingass

  42. fallfromstars liked this

  43. knifeyutensil reblogged this from yamino and added:

    Hey I’ve met her! She came to one of my classes to talk and we got to ask her lots of questions and she was verrrrrry...
  44. time-traveling-waitress liked this

  45. reilaciel reblogged this from yamino

  46. lizzysarai liked this

  47. leaguerulesfrownupon reblogged this from dcwomenkickingass

  48. sonicsora liked this

  49. ellimere liked this

  50. puni0307 liked this

  51. Show more notesLoading...

Please enable JavaScript to view the View the discussion thread


Share/Bookmark

A chat with former Batgirl writer Barbara Randall Kesel: “I just wanted to read stories where the women didn’t embarrass me”